Small Portfolio
|
XLF & IAU
|
16.99%
|
|
Position
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
DECK
|
6/15/2012
|
-38.57%
|
134
|
RIMM
|
7/16/2012
|
4.41%
|
103
|
OKE
|
9/25/2012
|
-1.40%
|
32
|
SEAC
|
9/25/2012
|
10.04%
|
32
|
CAJ
|
9/25/2012
|
-6.16%
|
32
|
DDAIF
|
9/25/2012
|
-8.40%
|
32
|
SSD
|
9/25/2012
|
-0.30%
|
32
|
AM
|
9/25/2012
|
16.51%
|
32
|
NSC
|
10/8/2012
|
-6.17%
|
19
|
WMK
|
10/22/2012
|
0.17%
|
5
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
3.52%
|
|
Small Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
12.05%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
15.13%
|
Scheduled rotation: selling AM; buying CFI.
AM is in the Publishing industry, and CFI is in the
Furniture industry. Although AM has been
a profitable trade, and may become more profitable still, it’s also a great
opportunity for profit taking and repositioning into a technically stronger
industry.
The move into Furniture is related to the SSD position in
the Building industry. More indication
that the efforts of Bernanke to back mortgage related securities are gaining
traction.
The CFI position also represents the first stock selection
using the new adaptive fundamental model, which will gradually fine tune the
fundamentals that are most synergistic with the technical environment targeted
by the Mousetrap.
The first adaptation is to add an examination of long term
Growth Persistence. A stock with
seemingly good fundamentals has less of a chance of being a value trap if it
has persistent earnings growth. That’s
not fool-proof, of course, since of all the stocks on the NYSE, DECK is
considered the best value by the model.
That MAY be true NOW, but it was certainly something of a value trap
when I entered the position five months ago.
In any case, the adaptive model will slowly update the fundamental
selection process until it reaches a (hopefully more profitable)
equilibrium. Although the model is
outperforming the S&P by an 11-12% annualized rate, I think it can do even
better with these steady adjustments.
Time will tell.
Tim