Wednesday, May 30, 2018
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
5/23/2018 Potential Sector Trade
Unless there is an unfavorable gap, the Sector Model will sell XLV and buy XLI tomorrow.
Tuesday, May 22, 2018
5/22/2018 Full Model Fully Developed
Sector Model
|
XLV
|
0.25%
|
|
Full Model
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
BT
|
8/11/2015
|
-57.48%
|
1015
|
TMK
|
11/23/2015
|
46.33%
|
911
|
NVR
|
12/16/2015
|
82.37%
|
888
|
CMP
|
2/19/2016
|
8.53%
|
823
|
NVR
|
2/22/2016
|
90.06%
|
820
|
AMWD
|
3/17/2016
|
29.63%
|
796
|
CASY
|
5/12/2016
|
-10.60%
|
740
|
AEM
|
6/7/2016
|
-13.40%
|
714
|
ESRX
|
6/13/2016
|
0.80%
|
708
|
AMED
|
6/16/2016
|
46.78%
|
705
|
FRO
|
6/27/2016
|
-32.50%
|
694
|
ASTE
|
7/12/2016
|
2.81%
|
679
|
MFC
|
9/1/2016
|
52.92%
|
628
|
SFM
|
9/8/2016
|
11.59%
|
621
|
CFFN
|
9/12/2016
|
2.11%
|
617
|
FOSL
|
5/11/2017
|
37.19%
|
376
|
HIBB
|
7/25/2017
|
116.79%
|
301
|
FOSL
|
7/27/2017
|
79.44%
|
299
|
HZO
|
8/1/2017
|
60.61%
|
294
|
CMPR
|
12/27/2017
|
15.62%
|
146
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
10.70%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
15.06%
|
|
Full Model
|
Annualized
|
15.14%
|
|
S&P
|
Total
|
103.22%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Total
|
166.16%
|
|
Full Model
|
Total
|
167.36%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Advantage
|
4.37%
|
|
Full Model
|
Advantage
|
4.44%
|
|
Previous
|
2018
|
||
S&P
|
98.38%
|
2.44%
|
|
Sector Model
|
172.95%
|
1.68%
|
|
Full Model
|
145.63%
|
8.84%
|
Coming out of radio silence, some plans for the future.
The Full Model is now consistently beating the earlier fundamental parameters I originally experimented with, and is now ahead of the Sector Model. The plan was to find a long term stock model that could beat both the S&P and the Sector Model, and it appears that after 7 years of live trading, I’m there.
That said, I’ll continue to post the Sector Model at least through the end of this year. But the plan has always been to have a full stock model as an open portfolio.
The holding period for the average stock is set at 2061 days, and may finally be topped out. At 5.6 years on average, the typical trade in a 20 position portfolio is 103 calendar days.
The Full Model is now consistently beating the earlier fundamental parameters I originally experimented with, and is now ahead of the Sector Model. The plan was to find a long term stock model that could beat both the S&P and the Sector Model, and it appears that after 7 years of live trading, I’m there.
That said, I’ll continue to post the Sector Model at least through the end of this year. But the plan has always been to have a full stock model as an open portfolio.
The holding period for the average stock is set at 2061 days, and may finally be topped out. At 5.6 years on average, the typical trade in a 20 position portfolio is 103 calendar days.
That’s a painfully easy portfolio to manage. Even a 100 position portfolio would only
trade once every three weeks.
Exciting? No. But that’s a good thing.
Tim
Thursday, May 17, 2018
5/17/2018 Potential Sector Trade
Apologies for the long silence. One of the problems of a longer holding model is that sometimes there is nothing to say.
In my case, there were no changes to the investments, but a lot of changes in my day job and life in general.
I'm still in a bit of flux on the personal level, but I will post every potential trade ahead of time. Ultimately, I'm planning an open portfolio with all trades stated before they happen.
Tomorrow the Sector Model faces a potential trade of selling XLI and buying XLV. The only thing to prevent such a trade would be a negative gap.
A positive gap would be XLI up in price more than XLV (or down in price less). So if XLI is down 5% but XLV is down 5.1%, that would be a "positive gap" between them. Conversely, if XLV were up 6% but XLI up 5%, that would be a "negative gap" between them. In the first case we would have a net gain of 0.1%, and in the second case a net loss of 1%.
Good trading tomorrow, and next month the Full Model will be due for a trade.
In my case, there were no changes to the investments, but a lot of changes in my day job and life in general.
I'm still in a bit of flux on the personal level, but I will post every potential trade ahead of time. Ultimately, I'm planning an open portfolio with all trades stated before they happen.
Tomorrow the Sector Model faces a potential trade of selling XLI and buying XLV. The only thing to prevent such a trade would be a negative gap.
A positive gap would be XLI up in price more than XLV (or down in price less). So if XLI is down 5% but XLV is down 5.1%, that would be a "positive gap" between them. Conversely, if XLV were up 6% but XLI up 5%, that would be a "negative gap" between them. In the first case we would have a net gain of 0.1%, and in the second case a net loss of 1%.
Good trading tomorrow, and next month the Full Model will be due for a trade.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)