Condition
|
Bear Market
|
|||
S&P Target
|
1240
|
|||
Small Portfolio
|
IAU & XLF
|
4.68%
|
||
Hedge
|
XLU
|
-3.13%
|
||
Position
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
Call
|
GCI
|
7/14/2011
|
-1.82%
|
310
|
Hold
|
CSGS
|
10/3/2011
|
29.51%
|
229
|
Hold
|
NLY
|
10/25/2011
|
5.42%
|
207
|
Hold
|
DD
|
10/27/2011
|
6.69%
|
205
|
Hold
|
KBR
|
10/27/2011
|
-9.54%
|
205
|
Hold
|
VG
|
10/27/2011
|
-48.33%
|
205
|
Buy
|
TTM
|
11/30/2011
|
40.05%
|
171
|
Hold
|
BT
|
1/4/2012
|
2.82%
|
136
|
Hold
|
PDLI
|
3/7/2012
|
1.48%
|
73
|
Hold
|
CLF
|
3/19/2012
|
-31.76%
|
61
|
Hold
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
-3.83%
|
||
Small Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
4.83%
|
||
Mousetrap
|
Annualized
|
5.37%
|
||
Hedged
|
Annualized
|
2.14%
|
On a week like this one, it’s important to take a step back
when looking at the state of the market.
We are now 62 points down on the S&P from the point that
I said the “Bear Market Rally” status was changed to “Bear Market.” My timing is a work in progress, so I don’t
aggressively short. Eventually perhaps I
will.
So what do my timing indicators say? Well, they are still mixed. My yield ratio model is treating this as a
correction in a bull market, with a bottom around 1265 on the S&P. An alternate low on that model could go as
low as 1205. Not the tightest of ranges,
but not the end of the world either. The
expected gain for the next year is 19.10% on the S&P from Friday’s closing
price.
My sector configuration model shows that a normal bear
market rotation could go as far as 900, but a bull correction would have us
higher just a month from now. The
expected gain for the next year is 19.98% on the S&P from Friday’s closing
price.
The outlier on the models is the 900 reading.
The more probable reading has us close to a bottom (if 5% is
close), with a reasonable expected gain for long positions that are held over
the course of the next year.
Nevertheless, as long as the money-flow is strongest in the
bearish sectors, there isn’t much use puzzling over whether this is a “Bull
Market Correction” or just a “Bear Market.”
A “bottom” normally shows up as a panic washout. On Friday, for instance, the Nasdaq up volume
was 37% and the down volume was 62%.
That’s hardly a panic washout.
On a bottom we also see some sector rotation as market
bounces a time or two. We haven’t had a
panic, we haven’t rotated, and we sure haven’t bounced.
The Mousetrap is 12 days away from the completion of the
beta test, and I still have not found the correct holding period. That’s a good thing! If the correct holding period is greater than
a year, the model will reach one of its primary goals as a Low Frequency
Trading algorithm. Right now it appears
that a year holding period should outperform the S&P on average by
15%. The 9.20% outperformance shown
above is because I was rotating the stocks too quickly.
Human error cost me almost 6%.
I do not plan to continue that process. 15% is more attractive.
The market is getting ready to panic. Probably not a big deal. Yes, Europe scares the hell out of me
too. I don’t see how we can possibly
survive. My instincts tell me to buy
gold and run for the hills.
Eh… being hedged is probably good enough…
Tim
Tim i enjoy this thread. I think that you should see if at a certain price "level" of profit ( 10%15% 20% 25% etc) the trade should be taken off rather than a "time period'.I took a trade off earlier on HAL because I realized 30% in a very short time. Now you may miss a nice run like TTM but you might "lock in" nice profits which keeps up your general average. Just a thought or 2
ReplyDeleteI've thought of that too. That target range appears to be 25%, according to my Excel spreadsheet. I've been toying with the idea of taking profits at 30%, but I'll have to go through the numbers a bit more.
ReplyDeleteThe most important factor for me is the ratio of volume-breadth to price-strength. If the price has caught up to the volume, there's no reason to leave the trade in play. But just price by itself is difficult to calculate.
Definitely something to consider, though!