Small Portfolio
|
XLF & IAU
|
17.84%
|
|
Position
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
DECK
|
6/15/2012
|
-3.90%
|
85
|
CVX
|
7/5/2012
|
7.02%
|
65
|
RIMM
|
7/16/2012
|
-0.83%
|
54
|
UEIC
|
7/30/2012
|
16.15%
|
40
|
QSII
|
8/6/2012
|
13.77%
|
33
|
SWM
|
8/23/2012
|
4.00%
|
16
|
FCX
|
8/27/2012
|
9.13%
|
12
|
DWA
|
9/4/2012
|
3.42%
|
4
|
CAJ
|
9/5/2012
|
1.11%
|
3
|
DVN
|
9/7/2012
|
1.61%
|
1
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
5.40%
|
|
Small Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
13.98%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
16.65%
|
The model is now completely converted to the upgraded
fundamental filters. BT was the last of
the Joel Greenblatt formula stocks to go, and now the remaining ones are
selected from a Benjamin Graham style filter similar to the one used on the “Value
Investor” portfolio on www.Validea.com.
I’ve also adjusted the rotation rules. The first two this week were scheduled, and
the final one was mandatory: BT had the worst fundamentals AND the worst technicals,
so it had to go.
DVN was only slightly better from a fundamental perspective,
but vastly better from a technical one. We
can thank the Environmental Protection Agency for favoring natural gas over
coal. Not good for coal (or the
country), but potentially good for DVN.
The biggest hope for DVN, however, is a central bank (temporary) rescue
of the Euro. That should fall apart
disastrously sometime in the future, but natural gas should get a double kick
from both industrial use and inflation if the Euro-fix works for a while.
If not, well, nothing will be a very good investment, will
it?
As I mentioned the other day, the rotations will slow down
again. There won’t be a scheduled one
this week, and it is unlikely a mandatory trigger will hit.
Time to watch what unfolds.
There’s a lot of talk about election years being bullish,
and that’s true. But even in election
years September has a bad track record.
We may be gritting our teeth over the next few weeks, and if President
Obama taps into the national gas reserves to try to juice his own election
returns, that might negatively impact DVN as prices across the energy sector decline.
But that’s not under my control, and it’s impossible to
predict. If I were him, I’d do it. But I
can’t select stocks trying to second guess people in power.
From a strictly technical perspective, the market seems to
be favoring cautious optimism over defensive sectors. On discretionary trades I’d still buy the
dips, but not be married to those positions.
The market may be forming a blow off top. Very profitable to ride, as long as you’re
nimble.
The Mousetrap isn’t nimble.
It’s just designed to go up more and down less than everything
else. I do have some non-listed discretionary
hedges on the side… and I’m being punished accordingly.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment