Sector Model
|
XLB & XLU
|
0.90%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
CAJ
|
9/25/2012
|
-2.33%
|
285
|
BOKF
|
2/4/2013
|
19.11%
|
153
|
ABX
|
4/11/2013
|
-43.14%
|
87
|
TPX
|
4/22/2013
|
-3.30%
|
76
|
TTM
|
5/6/2013
|
-10.06%
|
62
|
DLB
|
5/13/2013
|
-1.14%
|
55
|
MATW
|
6/6/2013
|
5.40%
|
31
|
OKE
|
6/17/2013
|
-9.79%
|
20
|
TSCO
|
6/24/2013
|
7.80%
|
13
|
BTI
|
7/1/2013
|
1.71%
|
6
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
9.62%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
22.17%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
28.53%
|
Rotation: selling TSCO; buying CLH.
There is chance in the market: a random randomness that can
destroy any trade conceived in a human brain that has evolved to look for order
in chaos and meaning in a bottomless void.
I was even privileged recently to take part in a discussion
in which two dozen men theologized that evil did not exist at all.
Meanwhile 70,000 and more are dead in Syria, and folks in
Egypt continue to starve no matter how many times they try to overthrow a
government that is secretly run by the military with civilians only serving as
front men in mock elections.
The idea is that good is substantial and that evil is not.
I’ll suggest for us humble investors, however, that there
are different layers to this. First and
foremost is another ancient maxim that doctors hold as a first principle:
“First do no harm.”
In this case, “good” is
the absence of evil. It may not be
the highest kind of good, but it’s better than the alternative.
So then there are four kinds of traders:
1) Those who do themselves harm.
2) Those who stop doing themselves
harm.
3) Those who do themselves good.
4) Those who profit off of the
harm others do to themselves.
Most of us fall in the first category. The Mousetrap is in the second. Buffet used to be in the third, but is trying
to join Soros in the fourth.
Does that make Soros evil?
No. Folks do themselves harm in
the market without any help from Soros.
Soros merely picks up the flip side of the bad trades they insist on
making. So far as the market is
concerned, Soros is neither evil nor good.
He simply recognizes something that my theologizing friends do not: evil
exists, and its face is the one we see in the mirror.
There’s nothing specific here, in and of itself. My point is that there is a WAY of looking at
the different kinds of investment strategies that are out there. Behavioral Finance, for instance, offers a
tempting suspicion that there are bad behaviors in others that we could exploit
to great profit. And, while that is
perhaps possible, it is infinitely easier to take the lessons there to curb our
own bad behaviors so that we can stop throwing money away.
Most of us are struggling to stay out of the first category –
and the thing that keeps us in that category is the delusion of being in the
fourth category. Forget it. Right now it is the citadel of a select few,
and very soon that citadel will only be inhabited by robotic black boxes that
have no idea WHAT they are exploiting, only that they can make money when they
do.
First, do no harm.
So, with apologies to St. Augustine, evil is NOT the absence
of good. For us, good is the absence of
evil.
As for the market – I have an experimental model that needs
fine tuning and further testing this week, but a preliminary view of it this
evening shows that the broad market is favoring small growth stocks.
That’s mildly bullish – enough for another pop I suspect –
though not enough for a sustained major bull trend. It’s too early to throw in the towel, and too
late to take a nap in peace.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment