S&P Projection
|
7/16/2014
|
1860
|
|
Sector Model
|
XLB & XLE
|
0.08%
|
|
Style Model
|
Small Blend
|
||
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
CAJ
|
9/25/2012
|
-0.76%
|
294
|
BOKF
|
2/4/2013
|
19.86%
|
162
|
ABX
|
4/11/2013
|
-37.77%
|
96
|
TPX
|
4/22/2013
|
-1.15%
|
85
|
TTM
|
5/6/2013
|
-8.07%
|
71
|
DLB
|
5/13/2013
|
-0.03%
|
64
|
MATW
|
6/6/2013
|
5.11%
|
40
|
OKE
|
6/17/2013
|
-0.92%
|
29
|
BTI
|
7/1/2013
|
3.47%
|
15
|
CLH
|
7/8/2013
|
5.89%
|
8
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
11.09%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
24.31%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
29.94%
|
No rotation, but a couple of new features.
I’ve been experimenting with a “Style” model that looks at
large, mid, and small cap; and value, growth, and blend ETFs. This creates a grid of nine Styles, similar
to the nine Sector ETFs I use in my Sector model:
Large Value
|
Large Blend
|
Large Growth
|
Medium Value
|
Medium Blend
|
Medium Growth
|
Small Value
|
Small Blend
|
Small Growth
|
The logic of this model is that the market progresses from
Value to Growth, and from Small cap to Large cap as a market cycle
progresses. So, at a market bottom Small
Value will predominate. This idea is a
bit counterintuitive, though, since “Large Growth” is “outperforming” in the
depths of a bear market only because it’s not doing as bad as the Small Value
stocks (that are getting smaller and more… er… valuable).
In any case, I’m using this as a comparison group to a
timing indicator I’ve been building off the sector model. The idea is that when they both agree there
is a higher confidence of “where we are” in a cycle. In the chart below I plot the aggregate
scores of both the Sectors and Styles against a Typical market top:
In this theoretical construct, the market appears to be in a
late bull – nearing a top but not there yet.
The expected value of the S&P a year from now is 1860 (as indicated
in the first line above).
Although I am NOT advocating market timing, it is a matter
of interest where we likely are in a cycle.
If we WERE nearing a top, for instance, we could expect the market to
accelerate in a typical blow off (hence the 1860 projection). But the sectors and styles are not YET
defensive, and it doesn’t appear to be any time to panic.
Keep in mind that this is just showing normal market
relationships. With all the Fed
intervention ANYTHING could happen. This
is not a market driven by the economy, but instead one driven by liquidity injections. Any correlation with positive economic
indicators is only because the economy ITSELF is also dependent on those
liquidity injections.
We’re like a young woman being wooed into a marriage by a
crazed lover with a credit card that WE’LL have to pay off once that expensive
ring is on our finger. Caution is warranted, but it's not time for the bride to run.
I’ve recently seen some calls to short oil, for
instance. Energy stocks tend to thrive
in a blow off top, and my sector model shows both energy and basic materials to
be well positioned. I would NOT short
oil here.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment