Sector Model
|
XLF
|
0.92%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
SR
|
6/2/2014
|
-10.54%
|
166
|
ESI
|
8/4/2014
|
-27.46%
|
103
|
STRA
|
8/18/2014
|
33.97%
|
89
|
PBI
|
8/25/2014
|
-6.96%
|
82
|
CLF
|
9/2/2014
|
-28.06%
|
74
|
KFY
|
9/29/2014
|
4.49%
|
47
|
IQNT
|
10/6/2014
|
47.38%
|
40
|
EDU
|
10/27/2014
|
0.49%
|
19
|
PLT
|
11/6/2014
|
-0.71%
|
9
|
BKE
|
11/10/2014
|
0.44%
|
5
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
12.78%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
25.77%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
24.17%
|
Rotation: selling CLF; buying CPSI.
Biting the bullet and taking the loss.
The Sector Model had a hard week, but is still well ahead of
the S&P for the year:
So much for the models.
What of the market itself?
Now that the United States is taking QE off the table (or at
least being outsourced), the behavior of the rest of the world is more
pertinent to our own future. Europe
continues to struggle with deflation.
Japan is devaluing its currency.
OPEC is pumping oil. Russia is
swallowing neighbors. ISIS remains a
threat. The United States is facing
another two years of gridlock, with most Republican bills of the future meant
to show what Obama will NOT pass, rather than finding something he will.
And the President will be practicing a political version of
a scorched earth policy – daring Congress to impeach him for unilateral
actions.
John Hussman is
predicting doom – but that is normally bullish…
All joking aside, my Sector model is showing relative
positions for a late bull and my Style model is showing an early bear. The aggregate of the two together averages to
a perfect market top configuration.
Demographics show the bottom trough of the secular bear to be 2015-2018.
A few weeks ago both Sector and Style models were configured
for an early bull, and the changed configuration in both is quite a feat. The market gyrations have not simply been
that of all stocks going down and all going back up. Behind the scenes the money has flowed out of
bullish sectors and into bearish ones.
Industries are more optimistic:
BUILDSUP
|
EDUC
|
ELECEQ
|
ELECTRNX
|
FUNL SVC
|
HLTHSYS
|
HUMAN
|
INSLIFE
|
PACKAGE
|
SEMI-EQP
|
WIRELESS
|
Most of these are bullish (with the exception of Health and Funeral
Services… two sides of the same bearish coin).
So, bull or bear?
There is no guidance in the tea leaves.
The “smart money” can’t seem to make up its mind.
Beware of bull and bear traps: false moves in either
direction that lure you into taking loses on both short and long bets that
reverse just as soon as you get into them.
Tim
Hi Tim,
ReplyDeleteWhat is the use of determining the 'Style' component in your matrix? Do you use it to determine in which industries you will look for individual stocks that you buy for your large portfolio? As far as I can see, it has nothing to do with the sector analysis since you can't choose between e.g. a small financials sector and a large one. You simply (have to) buy XLF. So, why the distinction between value/growth/large/small etc. ?
Wil
Hi Wil,
ReplyDeleteYou missed the excitement! I spent a good part of the last year trying to mix sector and style aspects into the full model selections -- to disastrous consequences. ESI and CLF were the worst offenders, but most of the selections underperformed the broad market as well.
Starting from KFY, I removed styles from the full model.
I still look at the style model on occasion to see how the ratios between the styles compare with those of the sectors. But you won't see me consistently refer to it. The model itself can and does out perform the S&P, but not as well as the Sector model, and mixing them together is bad news.
Consider it an artifact :-).
Tim
Thanks for the info.
ReplyDeleteAnother question on my mind: how deep were the worst drawdowns in your backtested sector model (2008)? In your posting of 10/26/2014 I could not figure out the drawdown as you were using a log scale there.
Wil.
Hi Wil,
ReplyDeleteI'll get the numbers tonight and post :)
Tim
Wil,
ReplyDeleteCan't find the "official" backtest I sent to Steve Cohen, but my return history shows a loss of -16.4% for the model in 2008.
I'll let you know when I find the actual record. I thought I had posted it to the blog....
Tim
Thanks, Tim. Such a low drawdown in combination with high returns. I'm staying here! ;-)
ReplyDeleteShould you find the 'official' number, please let us know.
Wil