Sector Model
|
XLF
|
1.37%
|
|
Full Model
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
ESI
|
8/4/2014
|
-40.88%
|
185
|
EDU
|
10/27/2014
|
-16.87%
|
101
|
UVV
|
12/2/2014
|
13.11%
|
65
|
JOY
|
12/8/2014
|
-15.59%
|
59
|
RS
|
12/11/2014
|
-13.15%
|
56
|
JNPR
|
1/5/2015
|
1.29%
|
31
|
COG
|
1/12/2015
|
-11.32%
|
24
|
GNW
|
1/20/2015
|
2.19%
|
16
|
AGCO
|
1/23/2015
|
7.30%
|
13
|
DNR
|
2/4/2015
|
-4.99%
|
1
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
11.99%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
24.42%
|
|
Full Model
|
Annualized
|
19.66%
|
|
S&P
|
Total
|
51.76%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Total
|
123.73%
|
|
Full Model
|
Total
|
93.74%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Advantage
|
12.44%
|
|
Full Model
|
Advantage
|
7.67%
|
|
Previous
|
2015
|
||
S&P
|
53.06%
|
-0.84%
|
|
Sector Model
|
122.60%
|
0.51%
|
|
Full Model
|
101.13%
|
-3.68%
|
Haven’t posted much in a while because of the move to a new
town and most of the family (myself included) coming down with the flu.
In any case, I should give a few notes on model stats. The Sector Model is actually up slightly more
than listed because of some triple whipsaws (one sector leading just before the
close, then a different one just after the close, then the first one leading
again just after the open). Normally, if
I miss a listed whipsaw, I use the worst reported number (either the
theoretical model returns or my actual returns, whichever is worse).
My actual returns on DNR are positive (0.71% up instead of
-4.99% down). When I trade with a
positive gap, I put the gain onto the sold
stock, rounding down the gain. So, on
yesterday’s trade MWW was flat and DNR was down more than 5%. I rounded down the gap and added that to MWW’s
final return. So, instead of being down
-6% it’s listed in my records as down -1% (to balance out DNR being listed at
-4.99% instead of +0.71%).
Not trying to be fancy – just auto-tracking stocks from the
previous day’s close, in order to capture dividend returns into the total. Also, I try to under-report, but not by too
much.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment