Sector Model
|
XLU
|
-6.81%
|
|
Full Model
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
ESI
|
8/4/2014
|
-47.80%
|
216
|
UVV
|
12/2/2014
|
22.44%
|
96
|
JOY
|
12/8/2014
|
-23.66%
|
90
|
RS
|
12/11/2014
|
-5.69%
|
87
|
GNW
|
1/20/2015
|
5.07%
|
47
|
AGCO
|
1/23/2015
|
10.21%
|
44
|
ALB
|
2/10/2015
|
5.16%
|
26
|
ISBC
|
2/17/2015
|
-2.91%
|
19
|
MPEL
|
2/25/2015
|
-8.01%
|
11
|
SSYS
|
3/3/2015
|
-0.89%
|
5
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
12.13%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
22.10%
|
|
Full Model
|
Annualized
|
20.00%
|
|
S&P
|
Total
|
53.97%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Total
|
112.28%
|
|
Full Model
|
Total
|
98.86%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Advantage
|
9.97%
|
|
Full Model
|
Advantage
|
7.87%
|
|
Previous
|
2015
|
||
S&P
|
53.06%
|
0.60%
|
|
Sector Model
|
122.60%
|
-4.64%
|
|
Full Model
|
101.13%
|
-1.13%
|
What do you do when you’re wrong?
Do you pretend you are right or do you look at what is wrong
so that you can fix it?
My wife is a doctor and has this problem when she is
sick. She refuses to admit that she is
sick and doesn’t slow down enough to get well.
In terms of stock investing that means recording your wins
and your losses, and analyzing the difference between them.
That kind of analysis also keeps you on track when something
seems wrong and may not be.
ESI was wrong, and I embedded that lesson into the
fundamental parameters of the full model.
What about XLU?
To answer that, here is a chart for the Sector Model since
Steve Cohen launched a fund that followed it:
I warned for most of last year that the 30% returns were an aberration;
and that at some point the model would revert back to its benchmark.
It has now done so.
In other words, the model is behaving as expected. Sometimes it will be above the benchmark and
sometimes below, but as long as it tracks that benchmark it will be behaving
normally.
No matter how annoying “normal” can sometimes be.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment