In the market, there are good days and bad days. Specifically, since 1950 there have been:
How
the market really is
|
|||
Down
|
Up
|
Ratio
|
|
Days
|
7849
|
8952
|
1.14
|
Average
|
-0.67%
|
0.65%
|
0.97
|
Max
|
-20.47%
|
11.58%
|
0.57
|
There are more up days than bad. But the average bad day is worse than the
average good day, and the worst bad day is almost twice as great as the best
good day.
But that’s not the whole story. In “Thinking, Fast and Slow” Kahneman
discusses his findings regarding prospect theory, beginning with these two
questions on page 279:
Problem 1: Which do you choose? Get $900 for sure OR 90% chance to get $1,000
Problem 2: Which do you choose? Lose $900 for sure OR 90% chance to lose
$1,000
In a number of thought experiments, he’s found that people
are more likely to take the sure bet on a win, and that they are more likely to
take a gamble on a loss. To make matters
worse, his research has also found that on a coin toss the average person would
not flip a coin if heads lost $100 and tails gained $150, even though the math
is greatly in your favor. In fact, the
break even point is a two to one ratio: we’ll flip a coin to bet our $100
against another person’s $200. The
reason is that a loss feels twice as bad as a win.
On a purely rational level, that’s nonsense. But on a real life level, if you are out in
the bush and hear a twig snap it could be something you could eat for dinner;
or it could be something that could eat you for dinner. You can afford to miss one meal, but you
cannot afford becoming someone else’s meal.
We naturally avoid risk unless all choices are bad. If you are facing an alligator in one
direction and a tiger in the other you might as well flip a coin. If all choices are bad you can only hope for
luck – and THEN you’ll choose a risk.
Put those equations into the stock market, and you get this:
How
the market really is
|
How
the market feels
|
|||||||
Down
|
Up
|
Ratio
|
Down
|
Up
|
Ratio
|
|||
Days
|
7849
|
8952
|
1.14
|
Days
|
15698
|
8952
|
0.57
|
|
Average
|
-0.67%
|
0.65%
|
0.97
|
Average
|
-1.34%
|
0.65%
|
0.49
|
|
Max
|
-20.47%
|
11.58%
|
0.57
|
Max
|
-40.93%
|
11.58%
|
0.28
|
Even though the market rises over time, it always feels like
you’re about to lose your shirt. And
that’s why people hedge or try to time the market even when they don’t have
enough to retire on. If you have more
money than you need to retire, I can understand being risk averse. If you’re already rich, hedging might make
some sense.
But 99% of us do not have enough to retire on. For the 99%, trying to avoid loss is a fool’s
game, and hedging is a sucker bet.
Pick sound investments.
Diversify. And don’t look too
hard. Don’t watch all of your stocks
turn red for the day. If you don’t have
enough to retire, don’t get risky and gamble either (the other fallacy we fall
into when all options seem bad).
If you don’t have enough to retire, learn to live on less
and save more for retirement. The less
you can live off of the longer your retirement dollars can be stretched, and
the more you save the more dollars you’ll have to stretch. Living on less and saving more is a win win.
But avoiding loss?
You can’t avoid loss. You can
only avoid gain by letting fear drive you into irrational trading (or an
irrational refusal to invest at all).
No comments:
Post a Comment