Condition
|
Bear Market
|
Rally
|
|
S&P Target
|
1240
|
||
Small Portfolio
|
IAU & XLF
|
7.72%
|
|
Margin (short)
|
XLK
|
5.44%
|
|
Position
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
GCI
|
7/14/2011
|
-0.08%
|
339
|
CSGS
|
10/3/2011
|
28.32%
|
258
|
NLY
|
10/25/2011
|
10.38%
|
236
|
KBR
|
10/27/2011
|
-13.12%
|
234
|
VG
|
10/27/2011
|
-44.98%
|
234
|
BT
|
1/4/2012
|
1.57%
|
165
|
PDLI
|
3/7/2012
|
7.73%
|
102
|
SAI
|
5/30/2012
|
10.47%
|
18
|
XEC
|
6/5/2012
|
-1.95%
|
12
|
DECK
|
6/15/2012
|
1.29%
|
2
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
-0.17%
|
|
Small Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
7.37%
|
|
Mousetrap
|
Annualized
|
4.67%
|
|
Margin
|
Annualized
|
9.86%
|
I need to work out a better way to report the Margin
position. The current position on XLK is
at a 0.29% loss. The cumulative of all
shorts has a net gain of 5.44% (which might get ripped out of the sockets this
week).
In any case, a few observations and some changes.
First, everyone was sure that the apocalypse had come a
couple of weeks ago.
The market therefore… went up.
Greece is going to vote itself free money that the Euro
crowd won’t want to give them.
The market will therefore… right. Who knows?
Now for the changes:
The trade to DECK involved two changes to the Mousetrap
model.
On the technical aspect of the model, a quarter holding
period now has a slight edge over a year holding period.
On the fundamental aspect of the model, I’ve incorporated
elements of the “Value Investor” filters defined on the website www.validea.com.
Below are the composite scores of the different validea
models. I created the composite by giving the average performance of their 20
stock portfolios (i.e. average of annual, quarterly, and monthly rebalancing
models), minus the performance of the S&P. The scores, then, are the average
annual outperformance over the S&P index from the date listed for the
launch of the model:
Value Investor
|
Benjamin Graham
|
7/15/2003
|
9.37%
|
P/E/Growth Investor
|
Peter Lynch
|
7/15/2003
|
6.43%
|
Price/Sales Investor
|
Kenneth Fisher
|
7/15/2003
|
6.20%
|
Growth/Value Investor
|
James P. O'Shaughnessy
|
7/15/2003
|
6.13%
|
Growth Investor
|
Martin Zweig
|
7/15/2003
|
5.43%
|
Momentum Investor
|
Validea
|
7/15/2003
|
4.97%
|
Book/Market Investor
|
Joseph Piotroski
|
3/26/2004
|
3.50%
|
Small-Cap Growth Investor
|
Motley Fool
|
7/15/2003
|
1.50%
|
Contrarian Investor
|
David Dreman
|
7/15/2003
|
0.53%
|
Patient Investor
|
Warren Buffett
|
1/2/2004
|
0.43%
|
Earnings Yield Investor
|
Joel Greenblatt
|
1/27/2006
|
-0.73%
|
Low PE Investor
|
John Neff
|
1/2/2004
|
-0.80%
|
At the time I began the Beta test, I was using the
Greenblatt filter as a placeholder. Last year was the worst year on record for
that model. I’ve since added elements of the Graham model, for obvious reasons.
Whereas Greenblatt merely looks at 12 month trailing
earnings yield and return on total capital, my adjustments add some favorites
of Graham:
Reported Annual Sales (High)
Current Ratio (High)
Long Term Debt (Low)
Total Current Assets (High)
Total Current Liabilities (Low)
EPS Growth 10 Year (High)
Price to Book Value (Low)
The first selection, DECK, is quite possibly a value
trap. I personally don’t see how it will
do well in light of an almost certain global recession.
But I’ve already confessed (above) that I have no clue what’s
going on right now, so all I can do is to follow the model. Money-flow is strong in the shoe industry,
and DECK has good fundamentals.
In any case, while I was pleased that my model avoided the
-29% performance LOSS the Greenblatt model experienced against the S&P last
year, I decided it would be interesting to see how it does with better
fundamental filters this year.
Might be entertaining.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment