Small Portfolio
|
XLF & IAU
|
17.80%
|
|
Position
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
DECK
|
6/15/2012
|
-38.03%
|
139
|
RIMM
|
7/16/2012
|
20.00%
|
108
|
OKE
|
9/25/2012
|
-2.18%
|
37
|
SEAC
|
9/25/2012
|
9.79%
|
37
|
CAJ
|
9/25/2012
|
-5.38%
|
37
|
DDAIF
|
9/25/2012
|
-8.61%
|
37
|
SSD
|
9/25/2012
|
3.11%
|
37
|
NSC
|
10/8/2012
|
-6.93%
|
24
|
WMK
|
10/22/2012
|
0.02%
|
10
|
CFI
|
10/31/2012
|
1.38%
|
1
|
S&P
|
Annualized
|
4.30%
|
|
Small Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
12.50%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
16.52%
|
Enter the super-storm.
We were a direct hit and were down for the count until
tonight. Before the storm I had entered
a conditional market order to buy CFI if the AM sell price was hit. As a result, the trade occurred without any
need for me to be online.
Thankfully, our house was spared, and after the mandatory
evacuation we came back to a place that was without power or cell service, but
was not permanently harmed from the wall of water that decimated the south
shore and buried fancy homes just a few miles from us. Even buildings two blocks from us were
flooded, but we didn’t get a drop.
I hear another nor’easter is set to hit on election day.
I’ll be happy when it’s over. After two years of political wrangling I feel
like I’ve been watching back to back marathons of the voice, the x-factor,
American Idol, and so you think you can dance.
In any case, no trades tonight, but I did want to comment on
the model itself. I mentioned recently
that I had created a self-adaptive fundamental selection filter. There was a reason for that. The dirty little secret inside the Small
Portfolio is the fact that IAU (gold) is just a secular toss-off to keep all
those eggs from being in the same basket.
Gold isn’t really a trade, as such.
It’s, if anything, a kind of hedge to balance the model in case
something screwy happens inside the guts of the sector ETF. While unleveraged ETFs are pretty reliable, I
don’t like to put all my assets in ANY single vehicle. Accordingly, I plan to update the Small
Portfolio to rotate through another group of ETFs that the model can analyze,
but which are asymmetric to the sector ETFs (currently in XLF). That will LIKELY be a regional rotation
(Europe, Asia, the U.S., Emerging Markets, etc.), but I have some more research
to do.
In any case, if you look at the guts of the Small Portfolio
from 5/31/2011 to today, IAU has gained 11.13% and the nine sector ETFs have rotated
into a 24.47% total gain (the average of those two is the 17.80% listed on the
Small Portfolio line at the top of the page).
The Large Portfolio, on the other hand, has a total gain of
only 23.52% since 5/31/2011.
While those are both far better than the 6.12% total gain of
the S&P 500, it’s not exactly how the model was designed to work. The Large Portfolio is supposed to work
BETTER than the simple sector ETFs. The
fact that it has not outperformed is because its gains have been in SPITE of
the fundamental selection filter, rather than partially BECAUSE of it.
I therefore now have two self-adapting features of the
model. I have a self-adapting holding period
feature and a self-adapting fundamental feature. Having started with Greenblatt’s simple
formula (which didn’t work), I tried a Graham filter – much more complex –
which helped, but not enough. Greenblatt’s
approach is a GARP formula (i.e. Growth At Reasonable Price). It’s kind of a hybrid Growth-Value
process. Graham is a pure value
investment process.
But the big question is… what the heck works best with my
model? What am I supposed to do, trial
and error?
Well, no. Took me a
while, but I worked out a way to track what fundamentals actually work WITH the
holding periods and technical environments selected by the model.
The first selections will not be perfect, and it will take a
while for the model to fine tune. As the
fundamentals adapt, that may shift the holding periods. As the holding periods adapt, that may shift
the fundamentals.
And as the High Frequency Trading algorithms out there
mutate, so will my own home made Slow Frequency Trading algorithm.
Kind of sick to think of quarter trades as “Slow Frequency”,
when that phrase should properly apply to two year holding periods.
But times change, and so will we.
There will be a new trade on Sunday. Until then, I hope everyone is safe. Have a splendid weekend.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment