Sector Model
|
XLU & XLK
|
0.13%
|
|
Style Model
|
Small Value
|
||
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
CAJ
|
9/25/2012
|
-13.08%
|
341
|
ABX
|
4/11/2013
|
-20.67%
|
143
|
TTM
|
5/6/2013
|
-15.58%
|
118
|
DLB
|
5/13/2013
|
-8.39%
|
111
|
OKE
|
6/17/2013
|
16.86%
|
76
|
BTI
|
7/1/2013
|
-0.06%
|
62
|
CLH
|
7/8/2013
|
9.33%
|
55
|
FAST
|
7/22/2013
|
-5.52%
|
41
|
VAR
|
8/2/2013
|
-3.76%
|
30
|
OUTR
|
8/19/2013
|
-0.54%
|
13
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
8.97%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
21.48%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
27.07%
|
Rotation: selling DLB; buying QCOM.
This is the second trade in the revised version of the
model, and so far as bullish vs. bearish industries is concerned, it’s
relatively neutral. The sector model is
also neutral, poised between expansion and contraction.
And, finally, the cycle chart is hovering around a market
top, but refusing to cross into a bearish pattern.
Short answer: the so-called “smart-money” is playing the “heck-if-I-know”
trade (when you can’t alliterate, hyphenate…).
There are two major reasons for the indecision: 1) they
really don’t know if we will continue a “bull” market or go into a bear, and 2)
no one knows what a “bear” market would even look like with Larry Summers at
the helm. From what I’ve been reading,
the man is just a political hack who will make Bernanke look positively frugal.
I can see Bernanke in an evening gown, with his long laced gloves
stretched out toward the crowds adoring him as he sings to them from his
balcony, “Don’t cry for me Argentina…”
We’ve been lucky so
far. Bernanke has merely been printing
enough money to camouflage deflation.
Summers is another beast altogether.
He’ll print money for political purposes. Everything the Republicans accused Bernanke
of doing, Summers will actually do – causing the Republicans to be embarrassed
about what they said of Bernanke even as their worst fears finally come true.
A bear market in such an environment may not show up in the
nominal “values” at all, but will only show up in the ratio of the market to
commodities.
If you are in cash, your cash will be worth less.
If you are in gold, you’ll hold your own in real “value”
while being taxed on fake “profits” and still end up with less.
And if you are in the market, well… you’ll either go up,
down, or sideways.
Hence the confusion with the smart money.
Regardless, I’ll try to own companies that will go down
less, and up more. And I’ll pop some Dramamine
if the rollercoaster ride gets me sick to my stomach.
Oh, and Syria? Just
noise. Terrible, tragic, horrifying,
noise… as far as the markets are concerned.
Worry about the lives that are lost and the children butchered instead
of your account. Value investors don’t
have to monitor their accounts day to day – which should give them time to
worry about people with real problems.
Tim
I'm having trouble with the tracked performance on sector model. XLU on 8/23 was reported at -1.30% return (close price that day was 37.66) but reported at +0.13% today (close price last Friday was 37.30)?
ReplyDeleteEven though I personally only hold one ETF, I will hold it through both positions, and so the model tracks both positions together.
ReplyDeleteThe numbers you see are from the latest current set. If there are whipsaws, it will track the latest set.
Thank you for the clarification. Since you recommended to avoid whipsaws by only holding the top position, could you track it separately from the dual-positions that whipsaws frequently?
ReplyDeleteI've been planning to. Just haven't coded it yet. When I do, I'll only show the position I'm holding and the numbers pertaining to it.
ReplyDeleteLooks like DLB caught the bottom (so far anyways) on exit tho QCOM also had a bounce since then. Are the forward prospects per your model still in favor of QCOM (vs DLB)?
ReplyDeleteYes, but sometimes it's wrong :).
ReplyDelete