Style Model
|
Large Value
|
||
Sector Model
|
XLF
|
0.00%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
BX
|
4/14/2014
|
8.22%
|
89
|
TIVO
|
4/23/2014
|
10.52%
|
80
|
SHOO
|
4/28/2014
|
-2.66%
|
75
|
PWR
|
5/12/2014
|
3.82%
|
61
|
PM
|
5/27/2014
|
-0.30%
|
46
|
SR
|
6/2/2014
|
2.78%
|
40
|
CFI
|
6/9/2014
|
-4.19%
|
33
|
FRAN
|
6/16/2014
|
-3.20%
|
26
|
ESI
|
6/30/2014
|
-4.93%
|
12
|
NUS
|
7/7/2014
|
-4.59%
|
5
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
12.98%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
26.82%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
25.74%
|
Rotation: selling ESI; buying BT.
This trade reflects a preference for Large caps over Small
caps on the style model.
The Sector Model switched from Financials, to Utilities, and
then back to Financials again on Friday:
In terms of both sectors and styles, the market
configuration is consistent with the end
of a bear market – which has been
hidden behind all of the Quantitative Easing.
I don’t show this graph that often, but the highest point on
the blue line is the current position in a NORMAL market cycle. A normal non-QE-market would be bottoming out
about now (Bear 4), and the economy would be gearing up for some normal types
of business investment (rather than the bubble investing we’ve seen over the past
few years).
The curious thing for me going forward is what will happen
when we achieve a true bull market configuration just as QE comes to an
end.
My guess is that the market will continue to rise until the
Fed actually tries to reverse QE
through rising interest rates. I don’t see
that happening yet. So, the end of QE this year shouldn’t cause the
market to fall. If we truly are at the
END of a seven year long bear market configuration, then this would in fact be
the correct time to end QE and let natural economic forces do their work.
In any case, those
who focus on normal economic forces have missed most of the “bull market” we’ve
experienced – Hussman being a notable example.
And those who focus on QE have been calling for an imminent bear to
start at the end of QE this year.
My gut instincts are with both of those camps, and since my
gut is almost always wrong, I’ll have to suggest that we won’t see an end to a
bull market this year, but instead the beginning of one – that is, the
beginning of an actual economically driven bull market instead of a fake QE
band-aid market.
HOWEVER, even normal bull markets have to fight the
demographic headwinds that underlie secular bears:
Nothing is exact in secular trends. They are more like a sledgehammer than a
scalpel. This chart shows a secular bear
most likely from 2002-2018. We all know
that it started two years earlier than that.
If it were to also end two years early, that would still be 2016 before
we were ready for another Reagan style economy.
Two years more, or four?
Either way, the secular bear isn’t over – which is precisely
why we’ve had all that Quantitative Easing these past few years.
So then, if my sector and style models are correct, we are
close to beginning a cyclical bull market, in a secular bear.
No reason to panic, but nothing to brag about either.
My suspicion is that we’ll have a boring year between now and
next summer.
Wish I could predict something fancy like a crash – but I’m
not in the business of selling news articles.
I’m in the business of personal investing.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment