Sunday, November 16, 2014

11/16/2014 A Time for Traps


Sector Model
XLF
0.92%
Large Portfolio
Date
Return
Days
SR
6/2/2014
-10.54%
166
ESI
8/4/2014
-27.46%
103
STRA
8/18/2014
33.97%
89
PBI
8/25/2014
-6.96%
82
CLF
9/2/2014
-28.06%
74
KFY
9/29/2014
4.49%
47
IQNT
10/6/2014
47.38%
40
EDU
10/27/2014
0.49%
19
PLT
11/6/2014
-0.71%
9
BKE
11/10/2014
0.44%
5
(Since 5/31/2011)
S&P
Annualized
12.78%
Sector Model
Annualized
25.77%
Large Portfolio
Annualized
24.17%

 

Rotation: selling CLF; buying CPSI.

Biting the bullet and taking the loss.

The Sector Model had a hard week, but is still well ahead of the S&P for the year:



So much for the models.

What of the market itself?

Now that the United States is taking QE off the table (or at least being outsourced), the behavior of the rest of the world is more pertinent to our own future.  Europe continues to struggle with deflation.  Japan is devaluing its currency.  OPEC is pumping oil.  Russia is swallowing neighbors.  ISIS remains a threat.  The United States is facing another two years of gridlock, with most Republican bills of the future meant to show what Obama will NOT pass, rather than finding something he will.

And the President will be practicing a political version of a scorched earth policy – daring Congress to impeach him for unilateral actions.

John Hussman is predicting doom – but that is normally bullish…

All joking aside, my Sector model is showing relative positions for a late bull and my Style model is showing an early bear.  The aggregate of the two together averages to a perfect market top configuration.  Demographics show the bottom trough of the secular bear to be 2015-2018.

A few weeks ago both Sector and Style models were configured for an early bull, and the changed configuration in both is quite a feat.  The market gyrations have not simply been that of all stocks going down and all going back up.  Behind the scenes the money has flowed out of bullish sectors and into bearish ones.

Industries are more optimistic:

BUILDSUP
EDUC
ELECEQ
ELECTRNX
FUNL SVC
HLTHSYS
HUMAN
INSLIFE
PACKAGE
SEMI-EQP
WIRELESS

 

Most of these are bullish (with the exception of Health and Funeral Services… two sides of the same bearish coin).

So, bull or bear?  There is no guidance in the tea leaves.  The “smart money” can’t seem to make up its mind.

Beware of bull and bear traps: false moves in either direction that lure you into taking loses on both short and long bets that reverse just as soon as you get into them.

Tim

 

 

 

6 comments:

  1. Hi Tim,
    What is the use of determining the 'Style' component in your matrix? Do you use it to determine in which industries you will look for individual stocks that you buy for your large portfolio? As far as I can see, it has nothing to do with the sector analysis since you can't choose between e.g. a small financials sector and a large one. You simply (have to) buy XLF. So, why the distinction between value/growth/large/small etc. ?

    Wil

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Wil,

    You missed the excitement! I spent a good part of the last year trying to mix sector and style aspects into the full model selections -- to disastrous consequences. ESI and CLF were the worst offenders, but most of the selections underperformed the broad market as well.

    Starting from KFY, I removed styles from the full model.

    I still look at the style model on occasion to see how the ratios between the styles compare with those of the sectors. But you won't see me consistently refer to it. The model itself can and does out perform the S&P, but not as well as the Sector model, and mixing them together is bad news.

    Consider it an artifact :-).

    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the info.
    Another question on my mind: how deep were the worst drawdowns in your backtested sector model (2008)? In your posting of 10/26/2014 I could not figure out the drawdown as you were using a log scale there.
    Wil.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Wil,

    I'll get the numbers tonight and post :)

    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wil,

    Can't find the "official" backtest I sent to Steve Cohen, but my return history shows a loss of -16.4% for the model in 2008.

    I'll let you know when I find the actual record. I thought I had posted it to the blog....

    Tim

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks, Tim. Such a low drawdown in combination with high returns. I'm staying here! ;-)
    Should you find the 'official' number, please let us know.

    Wil

    ReplyDelete