Sector Model
|
XLK
|
0.00%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Date
|
Return
|
Days
|
ABX
|
4/11/2013
|
-25.39%
|
205
|
QCOM
|
9/3/2013
|
5.46%
|
60
|
NEM
|
9/30/2013
|
-7.15%
|
33
|
BCR
|
10/4/2013
|
18.87%
|
29
|
BAX
|
10/7/2013
|
1.14%
|
26
|
BDX
|
10/11/2013
|
3.96%
|
22
|
DECK
|
10/15/2013
|
11.46%
|
18
|
ED
|
10/18/2013
|
2.93%
|
15
|
ISRG
|
10/21/2013
|
-1.19%
|
12
|
EW
|
10/28/2013
|
-16.60%
|
5
|
(Since 5/31/2011)
|
|||
S&P
|
Annualized
|
11.76%
|
|
Sector Model
|
Annualized
|
24.35%
|
|
Large Portfolio
|
Annualized
|
30.66%
|
Rotation: selling DECK; buying FFIV.
Question of the week: do you sell when a stock goes up or
when it goes down?
If you trade fundamentals, you either hold when it goes down
or buy more of it.
If you trade technically, you may have both a stop loss and
a price target.
Statistically, you are better off cutting your losses and
letting your winners run. A lot of folks
try to do this with trailing stops. That
is, your stop loss is always a certain amount below the highest price, or just
below the most recent low. I don’t use
the static return in my consideration, but rather the annualized rate of return:
Since I use technical considerations on an industry level
and fundamental considerations on an individual stock, I have both price
targets and stop losses on the industry that will POTENTIALLY rotate an
individual stock into the sell zone – but then I measure the fundamentals to
see if I actually want to sell it. Both
EW and BCR are in the same industry, for instance – so they will enter the sell
zone at the same time. WHICH one I sell
on a given week will depend on the relationship of individual fundamentals to
rate of return.
The actual ratio I use is fundamental potential / realized
return rate. The realized return rate on
DECK is over 800% annualized, but it does not have a fundamental potential to
sustain that rate, so I’m rotating off of a lucky pop and looking for another
bargain. It could go up another 100%
during the next year, but will not likely go up another 800%.
Sometimes the fundamental potential degrades faster than the
realized return rate, and I’ll take a loss.
But I end up with more gains than losses this way.
The Sector model is another beast entirely. Unlike the Full model it can whipsaw, as it
has this week. The average holding
period is a month, but sometimes we can have a week like this one. The intraday data even whipsaws after the
close, causing me to hunt for favorable gaps the next day.
So then, the Sector model closed in XLB, but AFTER the close
the data shows a slight lead for XLK… by less than one hundredth of one
percent.
I’m looking forward to the next boring stretch…
The method is to rotate if XLK gaps below XLB, and if not I’ll
recalculate toward the close. I’ve been
scalping about half of a percent on each favorable gap, but I much prefer the
boring stretches where I can let it ride.
Tim
No comments:
Post a Comment